**The NY Fraud Trial: Trump Barred from Speaking – Live Updates**
The judge in Donald Trump’s civil fraud trial has revoked his permission to give his own closing statement. Mr. Trump was intending to deliver at least part of the closing argument in his New York fraud trial on Thursday alongside his lawyers. The 45th president is facing a $250 million civil case brought by the state’s attorney general Letitia James, alleging years of fraud within his real estate empire. Additionally, a Washington DC Court of Appeals appearance saw Mr. Trump’s attorney suggest that the president should have immunity from prosecution, including for incidents such as ordering a rival’s murder by the US military, unless impeached and convicted.
**Key Points**
**Watch: Christie says Trump will always put himself first over American people**
Former New Jersey governor, Chris Christie, suspends his presidential bid and makes a hot mic statement criticizing his fellow Republican presidential candidates. He asserts that Trump will always put himself first over the American people.
**Trump reacts to Christie hot mic moment ahead of debate**
Donald Trump reacts to Chris Christie’s hot mic moment, using it as an opportunity to attack Nikki Haley, who is running second to the former president in the race.
**Christie heard on hot mic saying Haley will get ‘smoked’ and DeSantis is ‘petrified’**
Former New Jersey governor, Chris Christie, blasts his fellow Republican presidential candidates, not realizing that his microphone was on. He endorses former President Donald Trump in 2016 but criticizes him during his last year’s campaign.
**Trump’s ‘ridiculous’ claim presidents can kill rivals roasted by Jimmy Kimmel**
Late-night show host, Jimmy Kimmel, ridicules Mr. Trump’s attorney’s argument regarding presidential immunity and jokes about the potential consequences for Mr. Trump himself.
**Judges appear sceptical of Trump immunity claims in Jan 6 case**
In another case, three judges on the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit express doubt at the arguments put forth by Mr. Trump’s attorneys regarding his immunity from prosecution as an ex-chief executive.
The events surrounding the NY fraud trial and the related legal proceedings indicate the escalating legal challenges faced by Donald Trump. The decision to revoke his permission to deliver a closing statement adds another layer of complexity to the trial. As the legal battles continue, the implications for Mr. Trump’s political future and the broader political landscape are eagerly anticipated.**Understanding the Latest Developments in Donald Trump’s New York Fraud Trial**
In recent legal proceedings concerning Donald Trump’s civil fraud trial in New York, there have been notable developments that have stirred public interest and attention. The judge presiding over the trial has made significant decisions that have impacted the course of the trial. Here, we delve into the latest updates and controversies surrounding this high-profile case.
**Rescinded Permission for Closing Statements**
The judge overseeing Donald Trump’s civil fraud trial in New York has revoked the permission for the former president to deliver closing statements. This decision came after Trump’s attorneys failed to agree to “lawful, reasonable limits” for his remarks. The judge had previously agreed to allow Trump to deliver remarks on the condition that he only discussed “relevant, material facts that are in evidence.” However, certain restrictions were imposed, including refraining from delivering a campaign speech or impugning the judge, court staff, and attorneys. Amidst these developments, Trump’s legal team expressed their inability to comply with these stipulations, leading to the revocation of his permission to give closing statements.
**Trump’s Response and Remark on New York Fraud Case**
In response to the New York fraud case against him, Donald Trump made a statement that garnered attention for misspelling the word “ludicrous” as “ludacris.” This inadvertent error inadvertently namedropped the rapper Ludacris, prompting reactions from individuals, including US Rep Jared Moscowitz, who humorously pointed out the mistake on social media. Trump’s public response added a unique twist to the ongoing legal proceedings, prompting discussions and reactions from various quarters.
**Resurrection of Racist Birther Smear Against Nikki Haley**
Donald Trump resurfaced a discredited and racist birther smear against Nikki Haley, suggesting that she may not be a “natural born citizen” due to her parents’ immigrant status at the time of her birth. This controversial claim has stirred debate and criticism, especially considering the historical context of birther smears and their impact on political discourse. Trump’s allies were also implicated in similar claims against Kamala Harris, reflecting a pattern of leveraging unfounded allegations to undermine political opponents. The resurgence of such tactics has reignited discussions on the persistence of racism in politics and its far-reaching implications.
**Trump’s Response to Epstein Allegations**
In response to allegations and discussions surrounding his association with Jeffrey Epstein, Donald Trump took to social media to address the matter, highlighting his stance and countering the narratives surrounding the issue. Trump’s comments and rebuttals added a layer of complexity to the ongoing conversations about his connections and responses to controversies, generating varying perspectives and interpretations among the public and media.
**Conclusion**
The unfolding events and developments in Donald Trump’s New York fraud trial have captured widespread attention and sparked debates about legal, ethical, and political considerations. The judge’s decision to revoke the permission for Trump’s closing statements, Trump’s public response to the fraud case, the resurrection of a racist birther smear against Nikki Haley, and Trump’s response to Epstein allegations have all contributed to the multifaceted nature of this high-profile trial. These developments have further amplified the public interest and scrutiny surrounding the legal proceedings involving the former president, underscoring the significance and resonance of this case within the broader societal and political landscape.
